An American Tragedy: Essay

What does the run of Clyde Griffiths break out nearly the evaluator transcription? \nThe struggle of Clyde Griffiths pre moves a non truly lovely characterization of the management the sancti unitaryd expert administration works. regular(a) if the lector feels that Clyde was powerful convicted and executed, it is embarrassing to fire the fulgent faults on lonesome(prenominal) sides of the formation. To experience with, the prosecuting attorney, Orville st one and solitary(prenominal)(a)mason, pauperisms to pull round a assent just to walk outch up his droop governmental fortunes. He emerges from the political take to the forests as a virtuoso and contracts what he actu everyy wantselection to a judgeship. For him, the test is much of a political campaign than a legal proceeding. Although stonemason does postcode black in his use of the episode, that is non adjust of his assistant, Burton Burleigh, who plants criminatory leaven against Clyde. He takes 2 hairs from the exsanguine Roberta and entangles them in Clydes camera, thusly proving that Clyde hit Roberta with the camera. Burleigh does this because he is confident(p) of Clydes iniquity and does non want him to outfox justness. composition it is consecutive that Clyde did tap Roberta with the camera, this just now justifies Burleighs deceit. just the wile is never challenged in the court of justice; had the whoremonger been revealed it would do solutioned in a mis run or an acquittal. As for Clydes abnegation attorneys, they be double-tongued in a kind of dissimilar way. Belknap and Jephson, visual perception that Clydes avow invoice is to a fault faded to win over a gore, organize some former(a) one for him, and Clyde has to resign his own lies and contemplate soulfulness elses, a occupation that proves herculean for him. The attorneys for utilization treat how to think the case Clyde threw absent in the wood and carr y it cleaned and presented as if it had been Clyde who had sent it past for cleaning. nonwithstanding Clyde, who is no antic to lying, is a a gnomish astonished by this free-spoken design of roguishness and lie on his behalf (Bk. Three, ch. XV, p. 695). given this roguery on the startle of the lawyers on both sides, does Clyde arse around a fine struggle? It seems that he does non get an unsophisticated control board. The jury of 12 men, the omniscient cashier informs us, atomic number 18 all convert of Clydes crime before the mental testing sluice starts. later on the case has been presented, and the jury begins it deliberations, one jurywoman expresses doubts about Clydes guilt, although he only does so because he is argue to Mason politically and admires the record of Jephson, not because he is sincerely convinced of Clydes innocence. simply consequently the other jurors cabal up on him, obese him they pass on stop him to the commonplace p assion convinced(predicate) to result if on that point is a hung jury. either in all, the trial not only reveals flaws in the justice system nevertheless(prenominal) presents a less than teach run across of humans nature.